Place Order
speedyauthor-online-essay-helpers

cognitive psychology ackademick only

Unit 5: Module 5 – M5 Assignment 2 Discussion

Assignment 2: Discussion—Typical Reasoning

People often take shortcuts in problem solving and quickly arrive at answers. Known as heuristics, these shortcuts may increase the speed of decisions but may also decrease the accuracy of those decisions. The experiment used in this assignment deals with inaccurate decisions based on the conjunction fallacy, where people think the chance of two events happening at the same time is greater than just one event occurring. However, the chance of one event occurring is greater than two events occurring; hence, the fallacy.

Need Help Writing an Essay?

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper.

Write My Essay For Me

Access the CogLab demonstration Typical Reasoning. Follow the instructions to complete the demonstration. Next, answer the following questions:

  • For this demonstration, on average, do participants give higher ratings for single events or conjunctions of events? Based on the demonstration results, did you make your judgments by using objective probabilities? Why or why not?
  • What is a stereotype? How do stereotypes relate to the findings of this demonstration?
  • Respond to the following two situations:
    • You and two of your coworkers have just interviewed a candidate for a job opening at your law firm. Your boss asks you what inferences you made about the candidate during the interview. What can you do to maximize your likelihood of making a correct inference?
    • John is a young, energetic, muscular, and outgoing individual. Estimate the following for him:
        • He is tall and likes sports
        • He is tall, likes sports, and has lots of friends

Write your initial response in 4–5 paragraphs. Apply APA standards to citation of sources.

By Sunday, November 30, 2014, post your response to the appropriateDiscussion Area. Through Wednesday, December 3, 2014, review and comment on at least two peers’ responses.

Discussion Grading Criteria and Rubric

This discussion assignment is worth 40 points and will be graded using the discussion rubric
Use the  Respond link to post responses and materials that pertain to this assignment. Use the  Respond link beneath any existing postings to respond to them.
Assignment 2: Discussion—Typical Reasoning
Respond

This section lists options that can be used to view responses.

Expand All Print View Show Options
Responses
Responses are listed below in the following order: response, author and the date and time the response is posted.
Sort byResponse Sort byAuthor Sort byDate/Time*
(an instructor response)
conjunction fallacy Faculty Carter 10/26/2014 1:42:20 PM
* Times are displayed in (GMT-07:00) Mountain Time (US & Canada)

Get Fast Writing Help – No Plagiarism Guarantee!


We have MORE than 500 professional essay writers in our team. These are competent experts who work in colleges and universities. SpeedyAuthor is one of the most versatile essay writing service in the industry. You will get an MA or PhD essay writer from the subject area you choose.You can order a paper on any topic from us!

ORDER Flawless papers for All Your classes!

PLACE YOUR ORDER